| Pv | P | Yes | f191b_No0002_3C84_BP_LL.pdf, f191b_No0002_3C84_BP_LR.pdf, no RL fringe, f191b_No0002_3C84_BP_RR.pdf f191b_No0002_3C84_XP_LL.pdf, no LR fringe,
f191b_No0002_3C84_XP_RL.pdf, f191b_No0002_3C84_XP_RR.pdf f191b_No0002_3C84_PY_LL.pdf, f191b_No0002_3C84_PY_LR.pdf,
f191b_No0002_3C84_PY_RL.pdf, f191b_No0002_3C84_PY_RR.pdf f191b_No0002_3C84_ZP_LL.pdf, no LR fringe,
f191b_No0002_3C84_ZP_RL.pdf, f191b_No0002_3C84_ZP_RR.pdf f191b_No0002_3C84_iP_LL.pdf, f191b_No0002_3C84_iP_LR.pdf,
f191b_No0002_3C84_iP_RL.pdf, f191b_No0002_3C84_iP_RR.pdf | Pico Veleta with DBBC2 good weather, Tau225=0.24, but worsened towards the end of the observations, some thick clouds preventing pointing. Scan No0002 is probably the best. |
| Na | N | Yes | _____________________________________________________________ f191b_No0002_3C84_BN_L-IF0.pdf, f191b_No0002_3C84_BN_L-IF1.pdf,
f191b_No0002_3C84_BN_R-IF0.pdf, f191b_No0002_3C84_BN_R-IF1.pdf f191b_No0002_3C84_NP_IF0-L.pdf, f191b_No0002_3C84_NP_IF0-R.pdf,
f191b_No0002_3C84_NP_IF1-L.pdf, f191b_No0002_3C84_NP_IF1-R.pdf f191b_No0002_3C84_NX_IF0-L.pdf, f191b_No0002_3C84_NX_IF0-R.pdf,
f191b_No0002_3C84_NX_IF1-L.pdf, f191b_No0002_3C84_NX_IF1-R.pdf f191b_No0002_3C84_NY_IF0-L.pdf, f191b_No0002_3C84_NY_IF0-R.pdf,
f191b_No0002_3C84_NY_IF1-L.pdf, f191b_No0002_3C84_NY_IF1-R.pdf f191b_No0002_3C84_ZN_L-IF0.pdf, f191b_No0002_3C84_ZN_L-IF1.pdf,
f191b_No0002_3C84_ZN_R-IF0.pdf, f191b_No0002_3C84_ZN_R-IF1.pdf | The first GMVA fringes to NOEMA after its upgrade. Two polarizations are IF0 and IF1, both correlated as "RCP" (and so both designated as R in the plots, be careful if printing or copying these!) for technical reasons. Because apparently the quarter-wave plate was inserted incorrectly, neither really represents RCP or LCP, as can be seen from similar SNR in correlations to LCP and RCP of other stations. The real polarization must be unknown elliptical or linear. |
