Table of contents
You are currently comparing two old versions - only when you are comparing against the latest version can you revert. Return to version archive.
Combined revision comparison
...
- A100 GHz test, PI DW Kim, scheduled for Nn Pv On Ax
- Session info: http://www3.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/div/vlbi/globalmm/
- Session feedback: https://www3.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/div/vlbi/globalmm/sessions/apr25/feedback_apr25.asc
- ANTAB and log files: ?
- Station feedback:
- APEX just the lasts two 104 GHz scans are ok (IF issues before them), while at 114 GHz all scans were ok
had IF issues in the 104 GHz part, only the last - NOEMA reports all was ok, but the 114 GHz scans produce no fringes
104G scan likely ok, but 114 GHz scans all ok
- APEX just the lasts two 104 GHz scans are ok (IF issues before them), while at 114 GHz all scans were ok
- Entire track is project 100GTEST with observations at 104 GHz in the first half and 114 GHz in the second half
- Polarizations are somewhat off from circular; Onsala at 114 GHz had a QWP designed for 86 GHz, NOEMA perhaps similarly a 86 GHz QWP, whereas APEX and Pico observed in linear polarization without a QWP
...
Version from 17:31, 20 Feb 2026
...
- A100 GHz test, PI DW Kim, scheduled for Nn Pv On Ax
- Session info: http://www3.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/div/vlbi/globalmm/
- Session feedback: https://www3.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/div/vlbi/globalmm/sessions/apr25/feedback_apr25.asc
- ANTAB and log files: ?
- Station feedback:
- APEX
had IF issues in the 104 GHz part, only the last104G scan likely ok, but 114 GHz scans all ok
- APEX
- Entire track is project 100GTEST with observations at 104 GHz in the first half and 114 GHz in the second half
- Polarizations are somewhat off from circular; Onsala at 114 GHz had a QWP designed for 86 GHz, NOEMA perhaps similarly a 86 GHz QWP, whereas APEX and Pico observed in linear polarization without a QWP
...
Version as of 17:34, 20 Feb 2026
...
- A100 GHz test, PI DW Kim, scheduled for Nn Pv On Ax
- Session info: http://www3.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/div/vlbi/globalmm/
- Session feedback: https://www3.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/div/vlbi/globalmm/sessions/apr25/feedback_apr25.asc
- ANTAB and log files: ?
- Station feedback:
- APEX just the lasts two 104 GHz scans are ok (IF issues before them), while at 114 GHz all scans were ok
- NOEMA reports all was ok, but the 114 GHz scans produce no fringes
- Entire track is project 100GTEST with observations at 104 GHz in the first half and 114 GHz in the second half
- Polarizations are somewhat off from circular; Onsala at 114 GHz had a QWP designed for 86 GHz, NOEMA perhaps similarly a 86 GHz QWP, whereas APEX and Pico observed in linear polarization without a QWP
...
